What Are Examples Of Performance Locomotion Mutations Growth Genetic Makeup

1. Introduction

The quest to empathize the origin of species requires integration across all facets of the biological sciences. Biochemical, molecular, behavioural, physiological and morphological levels of variation routinely contribute to the process of speciation. Although non all species evolve from natural pick, near do, even in the face of factor menstruum. The evolution of complex genetic architectures (numbers, location and furnishings of genes) contributing to reproductive barriers can be rapid, and involve like or different solutions to the same trouble [1]. Environmental, therefore, plays a critical function in speciation [ii–4].

Choice is often multifaceted, from abiotic habitat characteristics to biotic interactions. Yet, when looking to the fossil record and beyond extant taxa, substantial evidence suggests that predator–casualty interactions have repeatedly and consistently produced long-term behavioural and morphological (e.yard. locomotion and feeding) trends in various clades (eastward.thousand. [5,vi]). Evolutionary branching has been ordinarily induced by ecological interactions betwixt predators and their prey [7,8]. Alternatively, predator culls of prey tin reduce interspecific competition and stifle speciation under some circumstances (e.chiliad. [ix]). Understanding the mechanistic nature of these interactions and their evolutionary consequences requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates structure, function and operation—that is, a biomechanical approach.

Biomechanics represents the study of biological construction and function using physical principles. Organismal operation represents the chief substrate upon which selection acts [10–12], and variation in operation often arises via variation in biomechanics. For instance, changes in organismal performance are often reflected in morphological shifts, such every bit muscle and bone size, shape, and arrangement, ultimately leading to an alteration of the forces acting within an fauna, or between an animal and its environment. Such changes tin occur during adaptation to new ecological conditions [13]. For case, consider a unmarried fish population that is split into two new habitats (figure i). I habitat is a low-menstruation surroundings, much similar the ancestral status. The other is a high-flow environment, imparting new selective pressures. The biomechanical demands in a high-catamenia environment favour a more streamlined and slender body to minimize drag, and higher aspect-ratio caudal fins to maximize thrust [14–16]. Drag is a force that resists the forrad motion of an brute, and thrust is a strength that propels an creature forrad. Thus, the response to changes in selective pressures is directly related to the resistance and/or production of force. As these two populations diverge over fourth dimension, they may go reproductively isolated for several reasons, including decreased fitness of immigrants and hybrids if these individuals show maladaptive functional traits compared with residents. This simple illustration of the biomechanical basis of reproductive isolation (RI) highlights the potential for biomechanical approaches to enlighten our agreement of the mechanisms of speciation.

Figure 1. The theoretical framework for ecological speciation. A species will exist divided past an abiotic or biotic isolating machinery (bottom panel). This will event in the occupation of different regions of ecospace (e.g. two lakes with completely unlike structural and biotic attributes), followed by deviation of the 2 populations away from the bequeathed population, resulting in the occupation of ii distinct regions of function space. The differential functional demands volition ultimately drive the alteration of underlying physiological (not shown) and morphological traits. If this is a outcome of phenotypic plasticity, no speciation will likely occur. With a genetic basis, and bold reduced fitness of hybrids, speciation will likely occur. However, variation in morphology and biomechanics will probable showroom a combination of plasticity and genetic-basis. In addition, we are not implying that some plasticity will hinder speciation.

The tight fits between form and role suggest the influence of adaptive evolution; however, the prevalence of adaptive traits, the mechanisms by which they arise and the respective phenotypic and molecular responses to selection are subjects of extensive contend. Hither, nosotros present a unique multidimensional approach to studying how natural selection influences speciation, with the ultimate goal of edifice an understanding of the origin of species through the report of the adaptive development of biomechanical traits and their effects on RI. The lens of biomechanics can open up up new predictions about the evolution of whole-organism operation in particular ecological environments. Moreover, biomechanical consequences of phenotypic variation are not ever straightforward, sometimes leading to mismatches between morphological changes and functional changes [17]. Thus, assumptions of functional inferiority based on morphology alone are non acceptable for predictions nigh speciation.

We highlight a quantitative framework for understanding population divergence and speciation built on a biomechanical foundation—i.eastward. written report the evolution of organismal office to uncover insights into the evolution of RI. As function diverges, as a result of contradistinct or similar selective pressures, lower-level morphological and physiological traits as well diverge (figure 1). Population divergence tin atomic number 82 to reproductive incompatibility, either in the presence or absence of factor menstruation, and can occur during the expansion of populations into new habitats [18,xix] or as habitats are fragmented or modified [20,21]. Although genetic drift and intrinsic incompatibilities may contribute to RI in these circumstances, hither we focus on extrinsic forms of isolation resulting from functional mismatches (e.g. functional inferiority of migrants and hybrids in foraging, feeding, fugitive predation, attracting mates and mating). That is, functional difference begets lineage splitting via functional incompatibility of the diverging populations, although additional (non-biomechanical) mechanisms besides could hasten or restrain the evolution of RI. Of grade, not all hybrids or migrants will exist functionally inviable or even junior, as in hybrid vigour [22], highlighting the need for empirical investigation of organismal function in the context of speciation.

Our thesis that the 'lens of biomechanics' provides insight into the speciation process relies on the following well-supported assumptions: (i) changes in ecological factors will result in differential selective pressures on one or more functional systems [23]. (2) Multiple solutions to a functional problem are probably common [24], and can atomic number 82 to functional divergence between populations experiencing like selective pressures. (iii) Functional capabilities of animals emerge from the combination of underlying physiological and morphological traits [25]. (four) Functional and morpho-physiological traits are commonly genetically based (e.g. [26]). (v) As function diverges betwixt populations, immigrant and intermediate forms may be functionally junior to resident forms [27], and thus speciation can occur by reducing migration and excluding any hybrids that might form between populations, resulting in RI.

Unlike other studies that take discussed biomechanics and speciation [13], we leverage the strong foundation of cognition in fishes to describe approaches that direct link biomechanics and speciation, detailing multiple modes of choice, multiple isolating barriers and modern biomechanical techniques that are critical for quantifying role. While applicable to a wide range of creature systems, nosotros focus on fishes because of their extensive ecological, phylogenetic and phenotypic diversity, equally well as their prevalence as model systems for studying speciation, many-to-ane mapping, and biomechanics. Predator–prey interactions in fishes take been a major focus of research over the by several decades [28,29], where survival depends on both the power to escape from predators and to catch prey [30]. Locomotor and feeding traits underlie predator–casualty interactions, and both respond to choice and contribute to RI [31,32], making predator–prey interactions fundamental to the study of speciation. Despite the incredible diverseness amongst fishes, common biomechanical links between form and function persist in the development of feeding and locomotion across wide phylogenetic groupings [33,34]. The groups that we propose as model systems are outlined in the electronic supplementary material and highlighted in effigy 2. We illustrate a framework that identifies the key ecological variables shaping predator–prey interactions, links genetic compages to phenotype, biomechanics and performance, determines the fitness consequences of functional variation and quantifies its furnishings on RI (figure iii).

Figure 2. Representative line drawings of the seven species/groups of fishes highlighted equally model systems for locomotion and feeding. Species names are listed past each drawing. Tabular data indicates whether the group has been examined in each of the categories. The citations are just examples [35–53]. A, abiotic; B, biotic; C, cranial; PC, mail-cranial; L, locomotion; F, feeding, Q, quantitative trait loci; CG, mutual garden; RAD, RADseq; AS, artificial selection; R, reproductive isolation confirmed.

Figure 3. Our proposed methodological framework. The full general flow is genetics—morphology—ecology—biomechanics—performance—fitness—reproductive isolation. However, multiple categories collaborate forth the path. For each category, we highlight some of the factors that should or could be quantified. For morphology, the top box represents ways to quantify the phenotype, and the lower box represents means to alter morphology. For biomechanics, the meridian box represents ways to mimic the biomechanics of the species or population of involvement, and the lower box represents means to quantify biomechanics in fishes. The robotic fish in this section is from [54]. The circled numbers stand for the order in which particular components may be quantified when seeking to understand the biomechanics of speciation, and this is described in more item in the text. (Online version in color.)

two. Predator–prey interactions

(a) Prey capture

Suction feeding, the master mode of casualty capture among fishes, involves the rapid expansion of the rima oris cavity that causes a sharp driblet in pressure level [55], driving nearby water and prey towards the mouth. Suction affects just a pocket-sized area near the jaws [56], pregnant that the fish must use locomotion to accurately position the oral fissure close to the prey for successful capture [57]. Thus, casualty capture involves the tight functional integration of locomotion and feeding [58–61]. Key locomotor factors include approach speed, acceleration/deceleration, trajectory, stability and timing [59]. The functional divergence in response to selection for enhanced feeding performance on different casualty can pb to a wide array of multivariate phenotypic changes. For example, Gobiomorus dormitor populations that accept colonized inland blue holes in the Bahamas feel shifts in the available casualty, driving changes in body shape, mouth morphology, suction generation capacity, strike kinematics and feeding performance on dissimilar prey types [62].

(b) Predator evasion

Fishes evade predation attempts using rapid escape behaviours. An example is the C-beginning, whereby powerful muscle contractions bend the fish into a C-shape and apace accelerate the beast [63]. Much research has focused on describing escape behaviours induced by controlled stimuli, all the same in reality, changes in ecological and predatory parameters can significantly alter these patterns. The sensory signals that mediate the prey's response and the motor behaviours leading to escape have been investigated for decades. Enquiry on zebrafish establish that prey are startled by the visual cues produced past an budgeted predator. Specifically, fish initiate a C-offset when the advent of the predator, from the perspective of the prey, increases in size in a higher place a disquisitional rate (credible looming threshold) [28], meaning that fish will almost probably respond to a close and fast-moving predator. The flow-sensitive lateral line system is besides crucial for detecting a predator'southward attack [64–66]. Zebrafish larvae use the lateral line to notice the subtle disturbance of water ahead of a swimming predator [65], and larvae without the lateral line are over 3 times more than likely to exist captured [64]. Ecologically divergent populations of 3 spine stickleback exhibit considerable differences in lateral line morphology [67] that are related to their ecological conditions (eastward.g. vegetation, amount of visual cues, habitat complication), potentially impacting the fitness of migrants or hybrids.

3. Key ecological variables

Many environmental factors tin can bear on whole-organism performance capabilities, and tin can influence selection on functional traits (figure 3). Here, we focus on the fix of factors that represent the most widespread importance for speciation in fishes. Substantial bear witness points to predator–casualty interactions as major drivers of diversification in fishes, strongly influencing the evolution of locomotion and feeding [4,29,68]. Important factors that tin affect predator–prey interactions in fishes include abiotic variables such as temperature, menses weather condition, dissolved oxygen, salinity and pH, besides equally biotic variables such as predator density and blazon, interspecific competitors, population density and casualty resource quality and type (figure 3).

4. How to obtain and quantify phenotypic variation?

Understanding phenotypic variation is disquisitional for assessing which forms provide an advantage in a given set of conditions. To obtain this data, nosotros tin can (i) straight assess existing phenotypic variation in natural populations and test how this translates into differences in functioning and fitness [69], (ii) manipulate animals past altering their morphology (including sensory systems) [64], (iii) utilise robotics/physical models [lxx], theoretical models and computational fluid dynamics to explore phenotypic space [71], and (iv) segregate phenotypic differences using experimental crosses between genetically and phenotypically distinct populations (e.g. [72]) (figure 3).

Determining the phenotypic changes that produce biomechanical differences affecting performance, likewise as the genetic underpinnings of these changes, requires quantification of morphology in unlike regions of morphospace, which is a multivariate representation of shape and structure of a species or multiple species. Photography, microscopy and radiography are commonly employed for quantifying morphology. More recently, techniques such as microcomputed tomography (μCT) allow 3-dimensional modelling and visualization of hard and soft tissue components.

Measuring phenotypic covariation patterns is key to capturing the nature and extent of variation present in a system, and in understanding evolutionary responses of multiple traits to selection. The action of choice on the developmental-genetic architecture underlying functionally correlated traits relatively stronger covariation between such traits equally a unit, in comparing to the residuum of the phenotype [73,74]. Covariation is also influenced by drift and factor flow [75,76], and can constrain the range of possible phenotypes available for selection [77,78] and bias the direction of evolution [79]. Alternatively, patterns of phenotypic covariation can facilitate adaptive change without compromising function [74,80–82].

five. Quantifying functional consequences of phenotypic variation among fishes

2 important steps in understanding how different phenotypes differ in function or functioning are offset, to quantify organismal function and any differences among populations or species, and second, to generate testable hypotheses nigh both the consequences and causes of these functional differences. This process is often quite challenging, but in contempo years a number of techniques (beneath) have get available that allow a much better agreement of organismal function and enable testing of the causes of differences among species.

(a) Iii-dimensional kinematics

High-speed videography can exist used to capture extremely small or rapid motions to quantify kinematics and ultimately operation. When coupled with approaches explained below, this can provide a powerful tool for agreement the biomechanics of fish locomotion and prey capture [57].

(b) Hydrodynamics

Fishes exert forces on the surrounding fluid using multiple command surfaces (locomotion) or by the rapid expansion of the rima oris (feeding). Force product in fluids involves the transfer of momentum from the brute to the fluid, leading to the shedding of vorticity [83]. Quantifying the motions of fluid around moving structures can exist achieved with engineering techniques such as digital particle epitome velocimetry (DPIV). With DPIV, water surrounding the fish is seeded with neutrally buoyant particles, a light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation sail illuminates those particles, and the movement of the particles can and so be imaged with high-speed video. The 2-dimensional and three-dimensional global flow fields can be calculated from spatial cross-correlation techniques to assistance reveal the fluid basis of fish office and behaviour [84]. For instance, iii-dimensional suction accuracy in centrarchid fishes was recently modelled and related to capture success [85].

(c) Robotics

One of the most challenging aspects of organismal biomechanics is separating cause from effect, and identifying the specific functional consequences of phenotypic traits in live animals. It is hard to fully and accurately sympathise functional observations given the inability to command all relevant variables: individuals and species always differ in numerous traits other than the one of interest. One avenue of research that minimizes such confounding factors is the use of a robotic system to modify but the parameters of interest. Robotic systems offer the advantage of facilitating force measurement, the ability to explore a large parameter space of possible parameters, and greater control over flow visualization measurements. We believe that there will be increasing use of robotic systems in comparative biology to allow more precise agreement of the relationship between the phenotype and functioning [86,87], especially where interspecific comparisons involve such distantly related species that one cannot take confidence in comparisons of biological systems or can serve as 'surrogate organisms' in cases where brute office cannot be straight observed. The design of robotic models that capture cardinal phenotypic features of these difficult-to-get species may be of use in testing the operation consequences of interspecific phenotypic differences that arise during the process of speciation.

(d) Computational fluid dynamics

Computational approaches share some of the aforementioned advantages that robotic systems take in serving as an abstracted version of biological reality that can be manipulated with relative ease to explore a large parameter space. Computational fluid dynamics mathematically simulates how fluids interact with surfaces using the Navier–Stokes equations. The primary claiming associated with computational models of pond and feeding in fishes is the rapidly developing and unsteady nature of the flow patterns that are produced (due east.g. [88]). And the phenotypic features of fishes involved in feeding and swimming are flexible and circuitous biomechanically, making development of an accurate three-dimensional structural model challenging and the analysis of structure–fluid interactions difficult. Centrarchid fishes accept served every bit the basis for computational models of both feeding [89] and locomotion [90], and these accept provided considerable insight into the link between structure and office. For example, sunfish (Lepomis) pectoral fins deform in a complex way during deadening speed labriform swimming and computational fluid dynamic analysis showed, unexpectedly, that this deformation pattern results in thrust generation on both the outstroke and instroke of the fin beat wheel.

(eastward) Neuromechanics

Our agreement of how fish trigger escape responses has been advanced by a wide variety of techniques, including electrophysiological recordings of the Mauthner cells [91], laser ablations of the Mauthner cells [92], and the addition of extra neurons during development [93]. Piece of work on fish as predators has helped us understand how visual data is processed for hunting [94]. Work on the lateral line system is revealing how information encoded by a unmarried mechanoreceptor elicits behaviour [95]. Farther investigation of the neuromechanics of predator–prey encounters promises to yield insight into the unique demands of unlike habitats. For example, using calcium imaging or electrophysiology to measure out the differential activity of nerves in unlike ecology conditions (e.g. even so versus turbulent water) will help us understand the basis of how habitat affects performance.

half dozen. Biomechanics of locomotion and feeding in fishes

Fish typically respond to two ecological shifts related to predator–prey interactions: (i) changes in trophic niche and (ii) changes in predation pressure. For example, rapid jaw development is observed in pupfish every bit they specialize on different types of casualty (e.k. hard prey or scales). Comparable patterns are observed in African cichlids. In stickleback, difference within a lake due to competition or amidst lakes due to predation pressure has led to shifts and divergence in the blazon of prey consumed. Across most groups, fish that become more than pelagic will tend to consume zooplankton whereas benthic ecotypes tend to focus on benthic macroinvertebrates. Although shifts in trophic niche can occur every bit a event of competition [96], sometimes leading to sympatric divergence in feeding structures (e.g. stickleback, centrarchids), predation force per unit area can induce a trophic shift in casualty by driving a alter in habitat use. The latter is common in a number of the groups outlined in the electronic supplementary fabric. And in guppies and mosquitofish, variation in predation risk also leads to evolution of functional divergence independent of trophic niche (east.g. predator evasion, [69,97]).

A major question in evolutionary biological science concerns the predictability and repeatability of evolutionary alter and its role in the origin of species. With divergent fish lineages repeatedly experiencing similar environmental/ecological gradients, this provides an opportunity to gain insight into the predictability of functional divergence at multiple scales (e.g. genetics, morphology, kinematics, performance, RI). The vivid future in this area is exemplified by the fact that we were able to highlight seven model systems in this paper (effigy 2). Thus, there is great hope for shedding low-cal on the extent of parallelism in functional evolutionary patterns at different scales among disparate groups.

7. Framework for the biomechanics of speciation: the functional link from genetics to reproductive isolation

Choice is a mutual driver of speciation [two,three], simply the functional mechanisms linking adaptive changes in genotype and phenotype to the evolution of RI are still largely unknown [one]. Relatively recently, a framework for linking morphology, performance and fitness was solidified [ten,11]. Just little work has extended this framework to speciation. We propose that biomechanics provides a necessary piece as it bridges morphology and performance (effigy three), and generates testable predictions for evolutionary divergence and RI [13,14,68]. Biomechanics is critical for defining the limits (constraints) to performance, and morphology is defined, at to the lowest degree in part, by genetics. Using an integrative framework that recognizes connections from genetics to RI, we can identify functional mechanisms of speciation: e.chiliad. using model fish groups to predict the development of divergent morphologies and mail service-zygotic isolation based on biomechanical and ecological cognition, and test the genetic footing of the reproductive isolating barriers [98]. The chief impediment to such an integrative analysis is the lack of study system for which all of the variables tin can be studied, but locomotion and feeding in fishes represents a promising artery equally they represent a suite of integrated characters that routinely exhibit convergent evolution in clan with adaptations to similar environments or ecological niches. Thus, our proposition to focus on fish predator–casualty interactions is based on the vast amount of existing data and the utility of the system. Insights gleaned from fish into the biomechanical ground of speciation volition be applicable for almost all animals that capture prey or get eaten by a predator.

The primary reasoning for including genetics in this framework is non necessarily to pinpoint the genes for particular traits per se, but rather to uncover the nature of multi-trait deviation (due east.g. genetic correlations versus independent evolution) and establish the extent to which population divergence reflects genetic differentiation, phenotypic plasticity or both (east.one thousand. common-garden experiments). If performance exhibits adaptive plasticity, this could minimize genetic divergence and ho-hum speciation. By contrast, identifying a genetic basis for a critical biomechanical trait will potentially reveal the functional basis of speciation. Once the extent of the genetic basis has been characterized, testing the outcomes of hybridization or migration will exist more productive with biomechanical approaches, considering these traits have definitive links to function in association with the environment and, as a consequence, more probably stand for targets of selection.

Adaptive divergence in biomechanical traits can facilitate speciation under ii master scenarios: (i) divergent selection favours different aspects of performance in different ecological environments, and divergence in traits increases RI among populations (i.e. ecological speciation), and (ii) populations respond to similar selection on operation by evolving different adaptive solutions that enhance RI among populations (i.eastward. mutation-gild speciation). Under both scenarios, populations must persist following adaptive peak shift [26] (figure i) and the biomechanical traits involved in adaptive divergence must direct or indirectly cause RI (e.g. immigrant inviability, extrinsic hybrid inviability, behavioural isolation via mate option (decline individuals with 'wrong' course or operation), mechanical isolation). Prior work has so far centred on the kickoff scenario, revealing that divergent choice appears to drive functional difference, with some studies linking biomechanical traits to RI—e.thou. Bahamas mosquitofish that take evolved unlike body forms to accommodate unlike swimming abilities in different predatory environments accept consequently evolved enhanced RI due to immigrant inviability and assortative mating for torso shape [31,69,99]. Little research to date has addressed the second scenario, although given the ubiquity of not-parallel phenotypic responses to similar environmental gradients [1], combined with the potentially widespread phenomenon of many-to-one mapping of form to office [100], this could prove quite important. That is, the choice surface for biomechanical traits might often be quite complex, with multiple adaptive peaks of similarly high fettle levels—and dissimilar populations could traverse different peaks. This is because performance reflects how skillful an animate being is at executing an ecologically relevant task [101], and this execution emerges from the integration of multiple underlying traits that could exist combined in various ways to create similar levels of performance.

To determine the biomechanical ground of RI, we must do the following things: (i) identify ecological divergence (east.k. lake versus stream), (ii) identify divergent morphological and biomechanical traits across populations/species inhabiting similar/different environments (population difference), (three) quantify the operation outcomes, (four) determine the genetic basis or plasticity of these traits and (v) uncover the role of these traits in speciation by linking them to fitness, RI or lineage diversification rates. Several of these steps volition necessarily exhibit complex interactions, such as performance driving ecological differences and ecology driving operation differences. Figure three illustrates and expands on this framework.

Studies of recent divergence are best suited to test hypotheses of the effects of adaptive biomechanical variation on RI. This is considering the observed phenotypes and genotypes involved are more probable to reflect RI that evolved in association with departure rather than variation that evolved following the development of RI and speciation. Recent studies of adaptive traits provide frameworks for testing RI in fishes, such as immigrant inviability [102,103], extrinsic hybrid inviability [98], behavioural isolation via mate choice [99] and mating incompatibility (mechanical isolation) [104]. Examining the role of physiological and biomechanical divergence amid nascent populations volition be of import for examining mechanistic underpinnings of RI [105]. Studies of older deviation can utilise phylogenetic comparative methods to examination for associations between evolution of biomechanical traits and lineage diversification.

8. Conclusion

From bee pollination to the part of the heart, biomechanics is crucial for understanding evolution. We provide a specific framework for incorporating biomechanics into the study of ecological and mutation-club speciation. Because speciation through the lens of biomechanics, specifically through measuring biomechanical traits associated with locomotion and prey capture, offers a holistic manner of measuring traits that are often the targets of selection in fishes, and indeed beyond taxa. Although the groups of fishes presented here correspond the all-time targets for understanding speciation through the lens of biomechanics, it should by no means exclude other fishes that clearly contribute to these questions (eastward.chiliad. salmonids [106]). We propose that the low-hanging fruit in the movement towards linking biomechanics and speciation will include (i) establishing the genetic ground of biomechanical traits, (ii) testing whether similar and divergent selection atomic number 82 to biomechanical divergence, and (iii) testing whether/how biomechanical traits affect RI. The next steps could be experimental tests that direct demonstrate links with RI. For example, using controlled crosses under a mutual-garden pattern, the genetic footing of biomechanical traits could be established while performance trials could test the prediction that hybrids are functionally mismatched for these traits. Because of the strong link of biomechanical traits with function in association with the environment, the opportunities to test the alternative consequences of hybridization and migration with these approaches will contribute to the quest for the origin of species.

Authors' contributions

T.Due east.H., S.M.R. and H.A.J. developed the thought for this manuscript, with subsequent input from all authors. T.Due east.H. wrote the start draft, and all authors provided subsequent text, comments and edits.

Competing interests

Nosotros have no competing interests.

Funding

This research was funded by Partition of Integrative Organismal Systems (IOS 1147043).

Acknowledgements

The Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre provided resources as the manuscript was existence conceived and written.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary cloth is available online at doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3461766.

References

1
Langerhans RB, Riesch R
. 2013 Speciation past selection: a framework for understanding ecology's role in speciation. Curr. Zool . 59 , 31–52. (doi:10.1093/czoolo/59.1.31) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
2
Schluter D
. 2009 Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323 , 737–741. (doi:ten.1126/scientific discipline.1160006) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
3
Nosil P
. 2012 Ecological speciation . New York, NY: Oxford Academy Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
4
Schluter D
. 1995 Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks: merchandise-offs in feeding performance and growth. Ecology 76 , 82–xc. (doi:10.2307/1940633) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
five
Vermeij GJ
. 1977 The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology 3 , 245–258. (doi:10.1017/S0094837300005352) Crossref, Google Scholar
6
Vermeij GJ
. 1987 Evolution and escalation: an ecological history of life . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
seven
Vamosi SM
. 2005 On the role of enemies in deviation and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis. Can. J. Zool . 78 , 2061–2078. (doi:x.1139/z05-063) Google Scholar
eight
Langerhans RB
. 2007 Evolutionary consequences of predation: avoidance, escape, reproduction, and diversification. In Predation in organisms: a distinct phenomenon (ed.
Elewa AMT
), pp. 177–220. Berlin, Frg: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar
9
Meyer JR, Kassen R
. 2007 The furnishings of competition and predation on diversification in a model adaptive radiation. Nature 446 , 432–435. (doi:10.1038/nature05599) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
x
Arnold SJ
. 1983 Morphology, performance and fitness. Am. Zool . 23 , 347–361. (doi:10.1093/icb/23.ii.347) Crossref, Google Scholar
eleven
Arnold SJ
. 2003 Operation surfaces and adaptive landscapes. Integr. Comp. Biol . 43 , 367–375. (doi:10.1093/icb/43.3.367) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
12
Wainwright PC
. 2007 Functional versus morphological multifariousness in macroevolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst . 38 , 381–401. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095706) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
xiii
Podos J, Hendry AP
. 2006 The biomechanics of ecological speciation. In Ecology and biomechanics: a mechanical arroyo to the environmental of animals and plants (eds
Herrel A, Speck T, Rowe NP
), pp. 301–321. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Printing. Crossref, Google Scholar
fourteen
Langerhans RB, Reznick DN
. 2010 Ecology and development of pond performance in fishes: predicting development with biomechanics. In Fish locomotion: an eco-ethological perspective (eds
Domenici P, Kapoor BG
), pp. 200–248. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers. Crossref, Google Scholar
xv
Langerhans RB
. 2008 Predictability of phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol . 48 , 750–768. (doi:10.1093/icb/icn092) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
16
Higham TE, Stewart WJ, Wainwright PC
. 2015 Turbulence, temperature, and turbidity: the ecomechanics of predator–casualty interactions in fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol . 55 , half-dozen–20. (doi:ten.1093/icb/icv052) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
17
Koehl MAR
. 1996 When does morphology matter? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst . 27 , 501–542. (doi:x.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.one.501) Crossref, Google Scholar
18
Rogers SM, Mee JA, Bowles E
. 2013 The consequences of genomic architecture on ecological speciation in postglacial fishes. Curr. Zool . 59 , 53–71. (doi:x.1093/czoolo/59.1.53) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
19
Wellborn GA, Langerhans RB
. 2015 Ecological opportunity and the adaptive diversification of lineages. Ecol. Evol . 5 , 176–195. (doi:10.1002/ece3.1347) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
20
Vanzolini PE, Williams EE
. 1981 The vanishing refuge: a mechanism for ecogeographic speciation. Pap. Avulsos Zool. (Sao Paulo) 34 , 251–255. Google Scholar
21
Damasceno R, Strangas ML, Carnaval Ac, Rodrigues MT, Moritz C
. 2014 Revisiting the vanishing refuge model of diversification. Front. Genet . 5 , 353. (doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00353) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
22
Hubbs CL
. 1955 Hybridization between fish species in nature. Syst. Zool . 4 , one–twenty. (doi:10.2307/2411933) Crossref, Google Scholar
23
Herrel A, Podos J, Vanhooydonck B, Hendry AP
. 2009 Forcefulness-velocity merchandise-off in Darwin'south finch jaw function: a biomechanical footing for ecological speciation? Funct. Ecol . 23 , 119–125. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01494.10) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
24
Bartholomew GA
. 1987 Interspecific comparison every bit a tool for ecological physiologists. In New directions in ecological physiology (eds
Feder ME, Bennett AF, Burggren WW, Huey RB
), pp. 11–37. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
25
Carroll AM, Wainwright PC, Huskey SH, Collar DC, Turingan RG
. 2004 Morphology predicts suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes. J. Exp. Biol . 207 , 3873–3881. (doi:10.1242/jeb.01227) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
26
Rogers SM, Tamkee P, Summers B, Balabahadra S, Marks M, Kingsley DM, Schluter D
. 2012 Genetic signature of adaptive peak shift in threespine stickleback. Evolution 66 , 2439–2450. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01622.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
27
McGee Doc, Reustle JW, Oufiero CE, Wainwright PC
. 2015 Intermediate kinematics produce inferior feeding performance in a classic case of natural hybridization. Am. Nat . 186 , 807–814. (doi:x.1086/683464) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
28
Dill LM
. 1974 The escape response of the zebra danio (Brachydanio rerio) I. The stimulus for escape. Anim. Behav . 22 , 711–722. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80022-9) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
29
Wainwright PC, Carroll AM, Collar DC, Twenty-four hours SW, Higham TE, Holzman RA
. 2007 Suction feeding mechanics, performance and diversity in fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol . 47 , 96–106. (doi:10.1093/icb/icm032) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
thirty
Walker JA, Ghalambor CK, Griset OL, McKenney D, Reznick DN
. 2005 Practice faster starts increase the probability of evading predators? Funct. Ecol . 19 , 808–815. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01033.x) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
31
Langerhans RB, Gifford ME, Joseph EO
. 2007 Ecological speciation in Gambusia fishes. Evolution 61 , 2056–2074. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00171.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
32
McKinnon JS, Mori S, Blackman BK, David L, Kingsley DM, Jamieson L, Chou J, Schluter D
. 2004 Evidence for environmental'south part in speciation. Nature 429 , 294–298. (doi:x.1038/nature02556) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
33
Lauder GV, Drucker EG
. 2004 Morphology and experimental hydrodynamics of fish fin command surfaces. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng . 29 , 556–571. (doi:10.1109/JOE.2004.833219) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
34
Wainwright PC, Shaw SS
. 1999 Morphological basis of kinematic variety in feeding sunfishes. J. Exp. Biol . 202 , 3101–3110. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
35
Hulsey CD, Roberts RJ, Loh Y-HE, Rupp MF, Streelman JT
. 2013 Lake Malawi cichlid evolution along a benthic/limnetic axis. Ecol. Evol . 3 , 2262–2272. (doi:ten.1002/ece3.633) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
36
Barluenga M, Stolting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick Thou, Meyer A
. 2006 Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439 , 719–723. (doi:10.1038/nature04325) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
37
Cooper WJ, Parsons KJ, McIntyre A, Kern B, McGee-Moore A, Albertson RC
. 2010 Bentho-pelagic divergence of cichlid feeding architecture was prodigious and consequent during multiple adaptive radiations within African rift-lakes. PLoS Ane 5 , e9551. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009551) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
38
Cooper WJ, Wernle J, Mann One thousand, Albertson RC
. 2011 Functional and genetic integration in the skulls of Lake Malawi cichlids. Evol. Biol . 38 , 316–334. (doi:10.1007/s11692-011-9124-nine) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
39
Robinson BW, Wilson DS
. 1996 Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in a trophically polymorphic population of pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Evol. Ecol . ten , ane–22. (doi:10.1007/BF01237711) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
40
Ellerby DJ, Gerry SP
. 2011 Sympatric divergence and functioning trade-offs of bluegill ecomorphs. Evol. Biol . 38 , 422–433. (doi:x.1007/s11692-011-9130-y) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
41
Neckband DC, O'Meara BC, Wainwright PC, Near TJ
. 2009 Piscivory limits diversification of feeding morphology in centrarchid fishes. Evolution 63 , 1557–1573. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00626.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
42
Arnegard MEet al.
2014 Genetics of ecological departure during speciation. Nature 511 , 307–311. (doi:x.1038/nature13301) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
43
Hendry AP, Hudson K, Walker JA, Rasanen K, Chapman LJ
. 2011 Genetic difference in morphology–performance mapping between Misty Lake and inlet stickleback. J. Evol. Biol . 24 , 23–35. (doi:x.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02155.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
44
Miller SE, Metcalf D, Schluter D
. 2015 Intraguild predation leads to genetically based character shifts in the threespine stickleback. Development 69 , 3194–3203. (doi:ten.1111/evo.12811) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
45
Lavin PA, McPhail JD
. 1986 Adaptive deviation of trophic phenotype among freshwater populations of the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Tin can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci . 43 , 2455–2463. (doi:10.1139/f86-305) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
46
Tobler G, Carson EW
. 2010 Ecology variation, hybridization, and phenotypic diversification in Cuatro Ciénegas pupfishes. J. Evol. Biol . 23 , 1475–1489. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02014.ten) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
47
Martin CH, Wainwright PC
. 2011 Trophic novelty is linked to exceptional rates of morphological diversification in two adaptive radiations of Cyprinodon pupfish. Evolution 65 , 2197–2212. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01294.ten) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
48
Martin CH, Wainwright PC
. 2013 On the measurement of ecological novelty: scale-eating pupfish are separated by 168 my from other scale-eating fishes. PLoS Ane 8 , e71164. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071164) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
49
Martin CH, Feinstein LC
. 2014 Novel trophic niches drive variable progress towards ecological speciation inside an adaptive radiation of pupfishes. Mol. Ecol . 23 , 1846–1862. (doi:10.1111/mec.12658) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
fifty
Martin CH
. 2016 Context dependence in complex adaptive landscapes: frequency and trait-dependent selection surfaces inside an adaptive radiation of Caribbean pupfishes. Development 70 , 1265–1282. (doi:10.1111/evo.12932) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
51
Ghalambor CK, Reznick DN, Walker JA
. 2004 Constraints on adaptive evolution: the functional trade-off between reproduction and fast-start pond performance in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am. Nat . 164 , 38–50. (doi:10.1086/421412) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
52
Engeszer RE, Patterson LB, Rao AA, Parichy DM
. 2007 Zebrafish in the wild: a review of natural history and new notes from the field. Zebrafish 4 , 21–38. (doi:10.1089/zeb.2006.9997) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
53
Kern EMA, Robinson D, Gass Due east, Godwin J, Langerhans RB
. 2016 Correlated evolution of personality, morphology and performance. Anim. Behav . 117 , 79–86. (doi:ten.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.007) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
54
Lauder GV, Tangorra JL
. 2015 Fish locomotion: biological science and robotics of body and fin-based movements. In Robot fish—bio-inspired fishlike underwater robots (eds
Du R, Li Z, Youcef-Toumi Thousand, Alvarado VY
), pp. 25–49. Berlin, Frg: Springer. Google Scholar
55
Higham TE, 24-hour interval SW, Wainwright PC
. 2006 The pressures of suction feeding: the relation between buccal force per unit area and induced fluid speed in centrarchid fishes. J. Exp. Biol . 209 , 3281–3287. (doi:x.1242/jeb.02383) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
56
24-hour interval SW, Higham TE, Holzman R, Van Wassenbergh S
. 2015 Morphology, kinematics, and dynamics: the mechanics of suction feeding in fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol . 55 , 21–35. (doi:ten.1093/icb/icv032) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
57
Higham TE, Day SW, Wainwright PC
. 2006 Multidimensional analysis of suction feeding performance in fishes: fluid speed, acceleration, strike accurateness and the ingested book of h2o. J. Exp. Biol . 209 , 2713–2725. (doi:10.1242/jeb.02315) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
58
Higham TE
. 2007 Feeding, fins and braking maneuvers: locomotion during prey capture in centrarchid fishes. J. Exp. Biol . 210 , 107–117. (doi:10.1242/jeb.02634) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
59
Higham TE
. 2007 The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: morphology, behavior, and performance. Integr. Comp. Biol . 47 , 82–95. (doi:x.1093/icb/icm021) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
60
Higham TE, Hulsey CD, Rican O, Carroll AM
. 2007 Feeding with speed: casualty capture development in cichlids. J. Evol. Biol . 20 , lxx–78. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01227.10) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
61
Kane EA, Higham TE
. 2015 Complex systems are more than than the sum of their parts: using integration to understand performance, biomechanics, and variety. Integr. Comp. Biol . 55 , 146–165. (doi:10.1093/icb/icv033) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
62
Martin RA, McGee Doc, Langerhans RB
. 2015 Predicting ecological and phenotypic differentiation in the wild: a case of piscivorous fish in a fishless environs. Biol. J. Linn. Soc . 114 , 588–607. (doi:10.1111/bij.12449) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
63
Domenici P, Blake RW
. 1997 The kinematics and operation of fish fast-start swimming. J. Exp. Biol . 200 , 1165–1178. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
64
Stewart WJ, Cardenas GS, McHenry MJ
. 2013 Zebrafish larvae evade predators by sensing water period. J. Exp. Biol . 216 , 388–398. (doi:10.1242/jeb.072751) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
65
Stewart WJ, Nair A, Jiang H, McHenry MJ
. 2014 Prey fish escape past sensing the bow wave of a predator. J. Exp. Biol . 217 , 4328–4336. (doi:10.1242/jeb.111773) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
66
McHenry MJ, Feitl KE, Strother JA, Van Trump WJ
. 2009 Larval zebrafish rapidly sense the h2o period of a predator's strike. Biol. Lett . 5 , 477–479. (doi:ten.1098/rsbl.2009.0048) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
67
Wark AR, Peichel CL
. 2010 Lateral line diversity among ecologically divergent threespine stickleback populations. J. Exp. Biol . 213 , 108–117. (doi:10.1242/jeb.031625) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
68
Langerhans RB
. 2010 Predicting evolution with generalized models of divergent selection: a case study with poeciliid fish. Integr. Comp. Biol . 50 , 1167–1184. (doi:10.1093/icb/icq117) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
69
Langerhans RB
. 2009 Morphology, performance, fitness: functional insight into a post-Pleistocene radiations of mosquitofish. Biol. Lett . 5 , 488–491. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0179) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
lxx
Lauder GV, Anderson EJ, Tangorra J, Madden PGA
. 2007 Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion. J. Exp. Biol . 210 , 2767–2780. (doi:x.1242/jeb.000265) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
71
Van Wassenbergh Southward, Day SW, Hernandez LP, Higham TE, Skorczewski T
. 2015 Suction power output and the inertial cost of rotating the neurocranium to generate suction in fish. J. Theor. Biol . 372 , 159–167. (doi:ten.1016/j.jtbi.2015.03.001) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
72
Dalziel Air-conditioning, Rogers SM, Schulte PM
. 2009 Linking genotypes to phenotypes and fitness: how mechanistic biological science tin inform molecular ecology. Mol. Ecol . 18 , 4997–5017. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04427.ten) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
73
Cheverud JM
. 1996 Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. Integr. Comp. Biol . 36 , 44–50. Google Scholar
74
Hansen TF, Houle D
. 2008 Measuring and comparison evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters. J. Evol. Biol . 21 , 1201–1219. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01573.10) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
75
Jones AG, Arnold SJ, Burger R
. 2007 The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability. Development 61 , 727–745. (doi:ten.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00071.10) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
76
Parsons KJ, Albertson RC
. 2013 Unifying and generalizing the two strands of evo-devo. Trends Ecol. Evol . 28 , 584–591. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.06.009) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
77
Riska B
. 1986 Some models for development, growth, and morphometric correlation. Development 40 , 1303–1311. (doi:10.2307/2408955) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
78
Atchley West, Hall BK
. 1991 A model for development and development of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc . 66 , 101–157. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1991.tb01138.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
79
Walsh B, Blows MW
. 2009 Abundant genetic variation + strong pick = multivariate genetic constraints: a geometric view of adaptation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst . 40 , 41–59. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120232) Crossref, Google Scholar
80
Wagner GP, Altenberg Fifty
. 1996 Complex adaptations and the development of evolvability. Evolution fifty , 967–976. (doi:10.2307/2410639) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
81
Jamniczky HA, Harper EE, Garner R, Cresko WA, Wainwright PC, Hallgrimsson B, Kimmel CB
. 2014 Association between integration structure and functional evolution in the opercular four-bar apparatus of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus (Pisces: Gasterosteidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc . 111 , 375–390. (doi:10.1111/bij.12203) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
82
Sanger TJ, Mahler DL, Abzhanov A, Losos JB
. 2011 Roles for modularity and constraint in the evolution of cranial diversity among Anolis lizards. Evolution 66 , 1525–1542. (doi:x.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01519.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
83
Drucker EG, Lauder GV
. 1999 Locomotor forces on a pond fish: 3-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry. J. Exp. Biol . 202 , 2393–2412. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
84
Flammang Be, Lauder GV, Troolin DR, Strand TE
. 2011 Volumetric imaging of fish locomotion. Biol. Lett . 7 , 695–698. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0282) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
85
Kane EA, Higham TE
. 2014 Modelled three-dimensional suction accuracy predicts prey capture success in 3 species of centrarchid fishes. J. R. Soc. Interface 11 , 20140223. (doi:ten.1098/rsif.2014.0223) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
86
Esposito C, Tangorra J, Flammang BE, Lauder GV
. 2012 A robotic fish caudal fin: effects of stiffness and motor program on locomotor performance. J. Exp. Biol . 215 , 56–67. (doi:10.1242/jeb.062711) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
87
Lauder GV, Flammang Be, Alben S
. 2012 Passive robotic models of propulsion by the bodies and caudal fins of fish. Integr. Comp. Biol . 52 , 576–587. (doi:10.1093/icb/ics096) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
88
Van Wassenbergh Southward, Aerts P
. 2009 Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling. J. R. Soc. Interface half dozen , 149–158. (doi:ten.1098/rsif.2008.0311) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
89
Bishop KL, Wainwright PC, Holzman R
. 2008 Anterior-to-posterior wave of buccal expansion in suction feeding fishes is critical for optimizing fluid flow velocity contour. J. R. Soc. Interface 5 , 1309–1316. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0017) Link, ISI, Google Scholar
90
Mittal R, Dong H, Bozkurttas K, Lauder GV, Madden PGA
. 2006 Locomotion with flexible propulsors 2. Computational modelling of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish. Bioinsp. Biomim . 1 , S35. (doi:x.1088/1748-3182/ane/four/S05) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
91
Preuss T, Osei-Bonsu PE, Weiss SA, Wang C, Faber DS
. 2006 Neural representation of object approach in a decision-making motor circuit. J. Neurosci . 26 , 3454–3464. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5259-05.2006) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
92
Liu KS, Fetcho JR
. 1999 Laser ablations reveal functional relationships of segmental hindbrain neurons in zebrafish. Neuron 23 , 325–335. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80783-7) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
93
Hale ME, Kheirbek MA, Schriefer JE, Prince VE
. 2004 Hox cistron mixexpression and cell-specific lesions reveal functionality of homeotically transformed neurons. J. Neurosci . 24 , 3070–3076. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5624-03.2004) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
94
Bianco IH, Engert F
. 2015 Visuomotor transformation underlying hunting beliefs in zebrafish. Curr. Biol . 25 , 831–846. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.042) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
95
Haehnel-Taguchi K, Akanyeti O, Liao JC
. 2014 Afferent and motoneuron activeness in response to single neuromast stimulation in the posterior lateral line of larval zebrafish. J. Neurophysiol . 112 , 1329–1339. (doi:ten.1152/jn.00274.2014) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
96
Werner EE, Hall DJ
. 1977 Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 58 , 869–876. (doi:10.2307/1936222) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
97
O'Steen South, Cullum AJ, Bennett AF
. 2002 Rapid evolution of escape power in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 56 , 776–784. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01388.ten) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
98
Rogers SM, Bernatchez 50
. 2006 The genetic basis of intrinsic and extrinsic mail-zygotic reproductive isolation jointly promoting speciation in the lake whitefish species complex (Coregonus clupeaformis). J. Evol. Biol . 19 , 1979–1994. (doi:x.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01150.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
99
Langerhans RB, Makowicz AM
. 2013 Sexual pick paves the road to sexual isolation during ecological speciation. Evol. Ecol. Res . 15 , 633–651. ISI, Google Scholar
100
Alfaro ME, Bolnick DI, Wainwright PC
. 2005 Evolutionary consequences of many-to-ane mapping of jaw morphology to mechanics of labrid fishes. Am. Nat . 165 , E140–E154. (doi:ten.1086/429564) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
101
Irschick DJ, Higham TE
. 2016 Animal athletes: an ecological and evolutionary arroyo . Oxford, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland: Oxford Academy Press. Google Scholar
102
Nosil P, Reimchen TE
. 2005 Ecological opportunity and levels of morphological variance inside freshwater stickleback populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc . 86 , 297–308. (doi:x.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00517.x) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
103
Hendry AP, Nosil P, Riesenberg LH
. 2007 The speed of ecological speciation. Funct. Ecol . 21 , 455–464. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01240.ten) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
104
Anderson CM, Langerhans RB
. 2015 Origins of female genital multifariousness: predation hazard and lock-and-central explain rapid divergence during an adaptive radiations. Evolution 69 , 2452–2467. (doi:10.1111/evo.12748) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
105
Garland T, Adolph SC
. 1991 Physiological differentiation of vertebrate populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst . 22 , 193–228. (doi:x.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001205) Crossref, Google Scholar
106
Laporte M, Rogers SM, Dion-Côte A-1000, Normandeau Due east, Gagnaire P-A, Dalziel Ac, Chebib J, Bernatchez 50
. 2015RAD-QTL mapping reveals both genome-level parallelism and different genetic architecture underlying the development of torso shape in lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) species pairs. G3 (Bethesda) 5, 1481–1491. (doi:10.1534/g3.115.019067) Google Scholar

Source: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2016.1294

Posted by: alligoodwousing.blogspot.com